Monthly Archives: December 2015

morality vs fraudulent morality

Well, I don’t see anything particularly immoral about most affirmative action as presently practiced, though I do think it is unwise and that the advanced liberal world view which is motivating it is horrifically wrongheaded and tyrannical. But is AA immoral per se? I don’t think so…. Zippy

I do not care for the absolute moralist. Affirmative action is immoral simply because it puts my kin and clan at a disadvantage. Whatever negatively impacts one’s blood and soil is inherently immoral.  I oppose anything that negatively effects the strength, prosperity and sovereignty of Southern Whites, especially Southern White men because the sovereignty, prosperity and continuation of our people, traditions and culture rest on masculine shoulders. Even more so those things depend on the strong backs and calloused hands of our yeomanry

Affirmative action hurts White men on the margins. It has no ill effect or practically no ill effect for a White guy with an IQ 20 points above median from an UMC or better background. Those sorts can afford the extra competition because it in fact does not create extra competition for them. The closer a White man gets to median, median IQ (100) median family income (65kish) the more negative impact affirmative action has. And let’s face it there are more of us White guys on the margin of medians and below then above.

Charity is a good, right and just but should start at home and spread from there. Christ takes to tasks those who do not 1st and foremost support their families and race is your extended family. I am more closely related to any random White guy on the planet then any negro down the street. If I understand the science correctly, I am as closely related to any random White dude as I will be to my great grandchildren (Might be great great grandkids. Bear with me please as I am one of those median IQ White guys and not particularly well schooled or a wordsmith of any sorts).

So I should tend to my parents and siblings before my cousins, my 1st cousins before my third cousins and so on and so on. What about the Good Samaritan? Good question. He tends to an injured man on the side of the road, but does not set up a system that puts his own kin at at a long term disadvantage AND Samaritans and jews shared a common genetic, Semites of different versions. Big difference then how progressive Whites side with non Whites over their own semi-distant kin and blood.

It is an ugly reality of the world that there is a finite amount of resource to be had. Aiding out groups to have a larger share of those resources vs your in group is atrocious and a crime against our humanity.  Whether we like it or not we are always in a demographic war with the various out groups in the world. Some times its a shooting war, some times it is not, but healthy people and healthy societies are always and automatically trying to garner a larger share of those resources to increase their own numbers and extend their peoples control over said resources. This, too, is just, natural and right

Whites who support affirmative action are traitors to their kin, and evil. It makes sense for negros to support affirmative action, as they are making the decision to help themselves and their kin over Whites. Logical and moral for negros to do so. It is evil for women to support affirmative action of women over men as it negatively impacts their family, sons, fathers, brothers, etc, to benefit women of some other family.

One of the reasons I find myself distancing myself from other Christians is their lust to hamstring their own people to aide those who are not kin. Sometimes that lust is something like affirmative action, some times its supporting charity groups that work mostly with negros, sometimes its having services in Spanish, ie welcoming a foreign invader who are greatly increasing the difficulties poor Whites face. To my mind such men are not Christian at all; they are progressives and not men of God ( though we are all sinners of some sorts)

Loyalty is 1st and foremost due to your smallest group. In the Army this means your fire-team over your squad, your squad over your platoon, your platoon over your company, your company over your battalion etc etc.


Why is this? The smallest unit you are part of is the most vital to your survival, the one you share the most hardships, forging the tightest bounds. Some guy in your platoon gets rained on the same time you do, but he is 50 yards down the line. It’s dark and you cannot see 50 yards away in the dark and the rain. The guy in your fire team is 5 yards away. You dig that foxhole in the rain with a guy in your fire-team, not some guy in battalion head quarters. You defend that foxhole with that same guy in your fire-team. If he dies, you die. Its a man in your fire team who covers you when changing mags in a fire fight, not some dude 100 yards away in another platoon, and damn sure not some random dude in the same division who might be hundred of miles away, not getting shot at or rained on. You might hate that fucker in the other fire team, but he is in your squad and more important to you and yours then the guy everyone loves in the other company a mile away. It is right and natural to support the people in your smallest unit over those of the larger.

There is very little absolute morality in the world


In my old line of work, it was my job to lay in hiding and shoot men from far away, in the back if possible. Killing them without the chance of defending themselves. To the other side, this is a great evil and an act of cowardice. To my side? I was celebrated for my ability to do this. ( I was and am particularly good at doing this to other guys like me which brought me additional status among my peers)

In the Old Testament, the Lord God Almighty had no problems ordering the ancient Israelites to commit genocide. Caleb and Joshua are celebrated by God for their actions in genocidal battles against His enemies. Sometimes every man, woman, child and animal were killed, some times just the men and women were taken as wives ( ie raped on their wedding night), kids made into hewers of wood and carries of water and their former owner’s wealth transferred to Gods people.


Yes there are some absolute wrongs and rights, but fewer then effeminate men would have us believe. Weak men always want to define masculinity and our Masculine God downward. Muscular Christianity is militant and warlike when required, merciful and charitable when possible but at all times charity and mercy must 1st be extended to our kin and kith before outsiders. Charity to out groups must never come at the expense of our in group, ie family.

For the effeminate, progressive and women…. yea I know, same same, this is not a call for an endless shooting war. It is recognition that all of life is strife and conflict, that people and groups of people are different with different genetic and cultural imperatives.  Avoiding this reality is for the weak and foolish. Men should be neither. Christian men are commanded to be wise and strong . It’s a tough gig.

Personal soap box, I think it is impossible for weak men to understand the Almighty. They simply lack the frame.

the night before Christmas

A Visit from St. Nicholas

By Clement Clarke Moore

‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
The stockings were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds;
While visions of sugar-plums danced in their heads;
And mamma in her ‘kerchief, and I in my cap,
Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap,
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from my bed to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters and threw up the sash.
The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow,
Gave a lustre of midday to objects below,
When what to my wondering eyes did appear,
But a miniature sleigh and eight tiny rein-deer,
With a little old driver so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment he must be St. Nick.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name:
“Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now Prancer and Vixen!
On, Comet! on, Cupid! on, Donner and Blitzen!
To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall!
Now dash away! dash away! dash away all!”
As leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the housetop the coursers they flew
With the sleigh full of toys, and St. Nicholas too—
And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the roof
The prancing and pawing of each little hoof.
As I drew in my head, and was turning around,
Down the chimney St. Nicholas came with a bound.
He was dressed all in fur, from his head to his foot,
And his clothes were all tarnished with ashes and soot;
A bundle of toys he had flung on his back,
And he looked like a pedler just opening his pack.
His eyes—how they twinkled! his dimples, how merry!
His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry!
His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow,
And the beard on his chin was as white as the snow;
The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth,
And the smoke, it encircled his head like a wreath;
He had a broad face and a little round belly
That shook when he laughed, like a bowl full of jelly.
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf,
And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself;
A wink of his eye and a twist of his head
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread;
He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,
And filled all the stockings; then turned with a jerk,
And laying his finger aside of his nose,
And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose;
He sprang to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle,
And away they all flew like the down of a thistle.
But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight—
“Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!”

Why the West is struggling with the islamic state and the war on terror

The self induced problems with the war on terror is the so called smart fellas with college degrees running it. These dumbfucks have no idea what they are doing, in no small part because they are fully invested in an unrealistic world view, a world view solely based on the indoctrination received during their college years leading them to believe there is political solution to conflicts with islam.  Their solution is one of  limited kinetic response, substituting firepower with a whole lot of social justice bullshit. They are fools of course ( the majority of non stem degrees whole purpose in life seem to be to produce fools and most stem degrees seemed to be wasted on dumbshit like looking for the next facebook or some shit)

The so called leaders of the West literally cannot imagine what motivates moslems. In part because they do not take their faith serious so they mistakenly believe moslems do not take islam serious… well that and the refuse to see the truth of islam in general. College kids belive in dumbshit like being part of the human race and a citizen of the world, hajjis are tribal as fuck, putting more stock in their kin and tribe then they do national boundaries. College fucksticks believe this sort of rubbish because they are blank slate-its thinkers ie hajjis are good little liberals deep down if only they have jobs, a clean environment and some feminism. Or some such bullshit

Then the SJW bullshit doesn’t work so what do they do? They double down on the stupid and  come to overly rely  limited military actions while at the same time committed to the failed ideas about winning hearts and minds…. convoluted I know but each plays together to create a cicrular cluster fuck

The problem with moslems is…. you guessed it, islam. Islam commands it’s followers to wage war against all believers until the whole world has submitted. Remember islam means submission. The koran allows for temporary peace treaties of 10 years during which time hajjis are supposed to retool for the next round of war. the koran tells hajjis unbelievers are to be given three choices, conversion, death or life as a slave/ second class citizen. islam is not only a religion but is also a political system and culture all rolled into one.  The koran and haidiths tell moslems how to set up governments ie a theocracy. It ranks people in value, tells you how to walk into a bathroom and how to walk out of a bathrom….  Western leaders cannot and will not come to terms with the reality of islam. Our “leaders” are to well indoctrinated in the blank slate stupidity.

The islamic state is a sunni moslem affair, the areas they quickly took over where… sunni areas of iraq and syria. Why did they take over so quickly? The locals want a sunni state and helped them. The iraq as one nation idea is popular with Western governments and the iraqis at the top of the iraqi food chain. The typical iraqi grunt is a shai moslem, poor and uneducated. He does not want to die fighting IS for the wet dreams of corrupt leadership of the West and iraq. In short the typical shai grunt in the iraqi army doesn’t give a fuck about fighting to keep sunni’s in iraq and won’t risk his life. He doesn’t give a fuck about iraq as a nation, he doesn’t give a fuck what ameirca thinks is best for him. This is tribalism meets religious solidarity, pure an simple. UMC Western Whites cannot comprehend either and the idea larger States are better then smaller States keeps the West from coming up with a two state solution of some sort. Instead of dividing iraq in two, a sunni iraq and a shai iraq they would rather force both of them to live in the same nation…. something the typical hajji on the street does not value or want.

The islamic state is not the junior varsity team. I mean it is technically and statistically compared to the USA’s military but for damn sure not poorly armed, trained or equipped compared to the other militaries in their area of operations. It is basically a blend of al-qaeda vets and former sunni vets from the iraq military. Many trained and equipped by america. So yes they are well trained and well equipped compared to their enemies. They also have better leadership then the american military and of course more motivated then the local ground forces.

The islamic state’s leadership is motivated, believes in what it is doing, knows what it wants to accomplish and wants to win.  You have to give them the edge in leadership as well as motivation.

If we pursed a purely military solution to IS in the Iraq/ Syria area of operations(as an example) we could have it wrapped up in weeks and months, not years. Pretty sure less then month once the stage was set

Nation building will always fail when you are dealing with savages such as moslems. I have spent to much of my life getting a 1st hand view of islam in action to think of them as anything more then savages to be eliminated. The typical jihadist is middle class for his area so jobs won’t change his mind. He knows the koran and the hadiths very well and understands islam calls for a ceaseless war with nonbelievers and that the only guarantee he has of heaven is dying in war. Its a very legalistic belief system keep a tally of your sins and righteous acts. Most moslems will do some time in hell to pay for their sins but not the men who die fighting non believers.  If Westren leaders could understand just these two things they could deal with islam from a rational perceptive. Side note, the really sick shit in islam is in the haidiths which is a very long list of things mahomet said and did. Anything mahomet did is to be emulated by other moslems, Like cutting off heads and marrying 9 year old girls.

Westren leaders ties the hand of our militaries in an attempt to court the favor of Westren progressives and moslems.  We slow down our operations during Ramadon but the hajjis do not return the favor, They use that 30 day break for R&R and to retool. Nor does slowing down the ops tempo gain you any warm fuzzys from the hajjis at large in your area of operations, but hippies eat that shit up because we did the same sort of thing when fighting other Christian White folks( or so they believe). Rules of engagement will keep you from killing a man planting an IED but can dictate you get involved when a hajji bitch slaps his old lady. These attempt to suck up to liberals at home and win the hearts and minds of the hajjis down range do neither. No one respects weakness and our rules of engagement make us weak.


We can defeat the islamic state in weeks and months, not years if we turn to a purely military solution. The military is not failing in the war on terror. The problem is we are not allowed to fight because our leaders do not know what they are doing. They want a political solution they can never achieve and keep the military from using its full might to bring about a military victory.

I am not saying we should take on the islamic state or any other group of hajjis. That is a different topic. Personally I think we should exterminate moslems but the point of this was to lay out a short case of why the West will never find success vs islam and hajjis.