the way of the beta

How do we defeat them?

Embrace monogamy
Support and sustain power of the American Patriarch
Embrace the role of the American Patriarch
Rebuild the family
Restore the culture

Way back when monogamy, Patriarchy, family and culture held the upper hand they all failed as a bulwark against the progressive agenda; why would it work to reverse it? It fucking won’t

That is not a plan of a man worthy of the title. That is the plan of a nice guy who wants to talk big and get likes on his facebook page

Well Ton, mr smartie pants, what is the way to defeat them?

There is one peaceful solution; voluntary dissolution of the union and the relocation of liked minded people. But that shit won’t happen either. damnyankees, jews, women, negroes, taco benders etc all despise liberty, family, faith, culture, tradition and Patriarchy

We either stack the bodies up like cord wood or we will be replaced in the land of our forefathers. Hell the yankees of 1776 have damn near been replaced by the White ethnics/ cheap ; labor they allowed to flood in to man factories.

They are not the people of jefferson’s posterity nor are they allies in regaining what our forefather bequeathed us

Advertisements

33 thoughts on “the way of the beta

  1. theasdgamer

    Gotta go Hebrew. Tents. Livestock. Nomadic. Like Abraham. Live off the land and your livestock. Go where there aren’t cities. Expect to be hunted. Guerilla tactics. Build up your family like Abraham did.

    Reply
  2. Cautiously Pessimistic

    Good to see a post from you, Ton. Glad you and yours are doing well.

    I find I’m waiting for the solutions occurring to me to line up with being appropriate for the problems at hand. Of course, I hope they never do, because I’ve got no illusions about my place on the Cannonfodder List.

    Interesting times, likely to be downright exciting soon.

    Reply
    1. SFC Ton Post author

      cannon fodder is for the other guy. I won’t get into details but give me 12 men and I could shut down any city in ‘merica. with in hours

      as for hope… I am not the hoping sort. Things will play out how they will play out. All I want to hear is good job you good and faithful servant and the respect of my forefathers.

      If things go well and my children and grandchildren and their grandchildren know nothing but peace and prosperity then praise God. If not… well thats above my pay-grade

      the whole Stoic thing… though likely BV will tell me how I am miss reading the Stoics

      Reply
      1. BuenaVista

        Why sell yourself short? 12 seems high.

        Given my prior life and customers, I wish I could discuss this and other similar matters online. But I don’t think it would be too smart.

  3. BuenaVista

    I’m not optimistic. We’re essentially in the same position as the outlawed Mormons (their leadership jailed and lynched, in a very Benghazi-like event). Only now there’s no unsettled wild place (Utah) to which to relocate.

    The Free State Project in New Hampshire is moving forward, trying to move a sufficient number of libertarians to NH in order to take over its governance. It’s not working, because the mainstream of NH does not wish to lose their control of things.

    We have flash-gang actions like Clive Bundy — that doesn’t work so good.

    In any state where there is a sufficient number of people to threaten secession, the bonds of debt, social conformity, and male subservience to the Magical Pussy (Magical Pussies want new cars, lots of sharing, cruise ship interludes, and access for progeny to the Ivy League) predict failure.

    More importantly, I question how many people are willing to shoot the innocent to advance an alternative society. I know I will not. I’ll choose death (well, I think I already am, but whatever) before I forcibly assist in the capture of any civil, existing unit through murder. That’s some Stalinist action, from my perspective, killing the idiots who think the point of life is to think positive and get along and make everyone feel good about themselves.

    ***

    As far as the Five Point Plan you quote, which is (I assume from Roosh or Roissy or some other guy like that): exactly what do these guys know about monogamy? If anyone wants to get my attention on monogamy, they’d better have 15 years or so of live-fire experience. So obviously, it’s ridiculous, as ridiculous as taking flying lessons from some pimpled child who’s really into MS Flight Simulator.

    Reply
  4. BuenaVista

    Also, thanks for jump-starting the blog. But really, we need more women here to counsel “your story is so brave and important.” Get to work on that, please.

    Reply
  5. SFC Ton Post author

    I will most likely delete most lady comment from here on out. Allowing whatever maybe clever or funny or asking to clarify but much past that will get the axe

    Reply
  6. Artisanal Toad

    Marriage, family and morality are all part and parcel of culture. The word “culture” has as its root the word “cult” which implies a common belief. The problem is the “common belief” that was taught by the church is completely wrong when it comes to sex and marriage.

    Way back when monogamy, Patriarchy, family and culture held the upper hand they all failed as a bulwark against the progressive agenda; why would it work to reverse it? It fucking won’t

    The problem is the only solution that will work has to be in line with God’s Word. Anything else is a temporary “solution” at best and is almost guaranteed to fail. Sometimes spectacularly. “Monogamy Only” is a bullshit catholic doctrine from the 4th century created by a bunch of perverts who were convinced that sex, even within marriage, was evil, wicked and sinful. Socially imposed monogamy is a disaster because monogamy without the possibility of polygyny transfers the power to the woman. It takes away the dread of the man’s ability to say “next” if the wife gets far enough out of line.

    So, for those not familiar with this stuff, I’ll clue you in on what God actually had to say about marriage and family and we need to start off with the design. It was God’s design that a girl would be born (not aborted) and grow up in her *father’s* house under his authority where he could train her and hold her accountable (Numbers 30:3-5). Then, she would get married. This occurred when she had sex the first time and lost her virginity. My latest post was on Genesis 2:24 explaining how that works. Yes, bang the virgin and you’re married to her. But, there’s a whole lot more to it than that and what the church has been teaching for about 1500 years is a combination of paganism, Stoic ideals and ancient Roman law. Total Bullshit, in other words. I tried to explain the basics of Biblical sexual morality in a previous post.

    Anyway, after that she’s under her husband’s authority (Numbers 30:6-16) and he is the one to hold her accountable. All this accountability stuff is because God cursed women with hypergamy in Genesis 3:16 and said (of her husband) “he shall rule over you.” That right there is the key when it comes to women. God said women are to be ruled by men, first by their fathers and then by their husbands.

    But, the Law on Marriage is found at Genesis 2:24, it’s just 24 words, but what it doesn’t say is just as important as what it does say (here’s an exegesis of what Genesis 2:24 says). In Matthew 19 the Pharisees came to Jesus and asked Him what the grounds for divorce were. Jesus quoted Genesis 2:24 and said “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together let no man separate.” Now, if you look real hard at Genesis 2:24, one of the things you don’t see is any authorization to terminate a marriage. To start one, yes, but not to end one. That’s more important than most can imagine because not only is there no authority to divorce, Genesis 2:24 did not limit a man to only one wife. Got that? Monogamy is a starter marriage…

    And, as I’ve pointed out elsewhere, God regulated, condoned, commanded and even participated in polygyny. With that record it should come as no surprise that nowhere in all of Scripture is polygyny forbidden in any way. Why? Because it’s the safety valve for all those betas in monogamous marriage! Divorce is forbidden to Christians so you can’t ditch the bitch, but with the very real threat of moving another wife into the home (and the marital bed), how far is she really going to push it? Because women HATE the idea of polygyny. They know that for one thing, it means they lose almost all their power over their husband. If that weren’t enough, there are the sexual aspects and that scares the shit out of most of them. What if they like it?

    I have long said that the Bible doesn’t mention female-female sexual activity, but I was wrong. As it turns out, I found where it’s implied (if not outright mentioned) in connection with polygyny. What happened is I looked at Leviticus 18 again and realized that the two regulations of polygyny- forbidding the taking a mother and her daughter or a grandmother – granddaughter combination; or taking sisters to be wives wasn’t just tacked on the end of the incest statutes, they were included. In other words, the Law assumes sexual contact between wives in a poly marriage. I explained it in the post on sexual morality (linked above), but it’s an interesting point because it (once again) proves that what the church has been teaching for 1500 years is a lie.

    This isn’t pie-in-the-sky bullshit. In the legal environment today, a poly marriage is the only safe marriage out there and if the husband has babies with all the wives then no matter what happens he’s pretty much safe. Even if one of the wives wanted out, with no marriage (the state cannot recognize polygyny as a marriage) there’s no divorce, no splitting assets and no alimony. That leaves awarding custody and courts are loath to separate siblings (even half-siblings) and you have to consider that the husband will still be living in his home with at least one other wife that the kids have grown up with while the mother will be leaving to be a single mom. Not exactly in the best interests of the child. And if she doesn’t get custody that means SHE has to pay child support. So, not only is there no cash and prizes to reward a divorce, but the husband is more likely to get custody, all of which is a serious disincentive to leaving. The possibility of her having to pay CS is an incentive to stay and work things out.

    None of this requires any legal stuff or laws, all it requires is decent men gathering up a few willing women, signing a contract of marriage and putting buns in their ovens. Not saying it’s easy, but it can be done and after that it’s just management. I’ve come to the conclusion that there’s no point in talking to adults about this so I’m putting together a teenagers guide to sex and marriage that explains what the Bible really says about all that stuff and how the guys can get laid all they want without being in sin. Call it a slut-shopping guide. I suspect there’s a real market for this amongst the blue-pill blue-balled young guys in churches. After all, I’m just pointing out what the Bible actually says and how what the church teaches about sex and marriage is a lie.

    The reason this works is simple: A guy shows up with multiple wives who are (reasonably) well behaved, feminine, submissive and good looking, he’s got his patriarch proof on display in spades. Just from a preselection bias point of view women want him and men want to be like him. Alpha by definition. And you won’t hear any beta pussy-whipped “mutual submission” or “servant leadership” BS coming out of his mouth. I have seen this and it’s amazing. I have watched bitchy monogamous wives turn gooey and submissive when confronted by a patriarchal husband with multiple wives. My favorite example was a group of poly husbands were talking and one of the mono-wives decided to interrupt. One of the men gave her the look a father gives a bratty child and said “woman, be silent. Men are speaking.” And she shut up. And her husband got angry because he KNEW that if he’d said something like that to her it would have been a huge screaming fight.

    So, yeah, the social influence of polygyny is something that really has to be seen to be believed and at the end of the day, that’s what counts. It’s the same as the way Christianity is supposed to work. You show the people something they really want and that’s when they realize how much their life sucks and they want what you’ve got. In this case, give people a glimpse of what a poly life is like and a portion of both men and women will become converts. Not all of them, not by a long shot, but enough that poly will have a serious impact on monogamy.

    The other thing to do is start teaching young men how to help all the adulterous women out there get rid of their unintentional marriages (see the complete exegesis of Genesis 2:24 – it’s over on the right side). You see, a virgin is automatically married the first time she has sex. A woman who is not a virgin and not married only gets married if she consents to marry. But, having sex outside marriage isn’t a sin, so she can give guys a test drive before deciding whether to marry them and, again, that isn’t a sin. That’s completely contrary to what the church teaches, but it is what the Bible has to say.

    The effect of taking a strong stand on that and telling the young shitlords to go visit churches and tear it up will be to emphasize that 1) a woman is married when she loses her virginity; and 2) that virginity has great value to both God and men. I’m looking forward to seeing young women with shirts that say

    Daddy has a shotgun and a backhoe…
    I have a hymen. If you break it, it’s
    married or buried. Your choice

    Reply
  7. Artisanal Toad

    oops.

    The link to the core exegesis of Genesis 2:24 is here:

    The link to the “big picture” which is the complete exegesis of Genesis 2:24 is here:

    That’s not the latest version because I’m still finding errors and making a few changes. I’m still not done with flogging the Catholic history, but it’s about 90% done.

    These are large files, best saved and looked at on the computer with a photo viewer such as windows live photo viewer. If you have a scrolling mouse it makes it really easy to zoom in and out.

    Reply
  8. SFC Ton Post author

    The 5 point plan is from Vox, who in my mind is all show and no go

    I’m a simple country boy so I have not yet work through all of AT’s reply. However he hits on something,though indirectly

    Folks who call for such Leave it to Beaver like 5 points plan are lacking in understanding of the complexities faced. The up side to the let the bodies hit the floor approach is it would cut through a ton of bullshit, a massive and barbaric social rebooting that would give such a Ward and June Cleaver 5 point plan its best chance of success.

    Now, BV says he doesn’t have the stomach to pull the trigger on useful idiots and I say, thank God. Masculinity is the ablity to commit violence. However not all men should make it their mission. If you can pull a gun and pull the trigger when someone wants your wallet, throw a decent right hand, jam up a take down and deal with a dude who pulls a knife you have achieved that masculine bar. When need a nation full of Yeomen plumbers, engineers, truck drivers etc more then we need a nation full of SMU guys. Not to pick but to many people make to much of my masculinity equals the ablity to commit violence comment. To put it into military terms, every White man over the age of 15 should be light infantry, very few of us should be SOCOM.

    However, men like BV don’t need to pull the trigger. If things were nasty enough and if it was time for the bodies to hit the floor, the BV’s of the world only need to stand by while the less pleasant sort of men go to work.

    In more practical terms. the useful idiots are just that and no real threat with out the cadre of trouble makers. Its the cadre who needs to take the dirt nap. The idiots just need a better crop of idiots setting the course. and the only idiots who need shot are the ones who would defend the cadre.

    In stark terms the bodies will hit the floor, the question is when? and will it be theirs or ours ( more likely our kids or our kids kids). The day traditional minded Whites are 30% or less of the usa population is the day the non Whites are set loose to hunt us down.

    Reply
    1. BuenaVista

      That’s actually a fair summary of what I did in my last company, not that it doesn’t present some major head-complexity now. (We were recruited to stand up a product for counter-terrorism/counter-insurgency intel, and supplied it to the major IC agencies.)

      Here’s a sobering look at the current status of the surveillance state:

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-08/edward-snowdens-new-revelations-are-truly-chilling

      I had a business relationship with one of Snowden’s bosses.

      Reply
    2. theshadowedknight

      That is why guys like me exist. Give me a woman and a little space to raise my children and I can be a fairly peaceful man. Deprive me of women and push me around and I will drown my enemies in the blood of my enemies. At least until someone puts me down. For now, I wait.

      Once it starts, though, the people who want to sit it our best be out of the way. If you are going to get out of the way, make sure you are actually out of the way. If you are sitting on your ass in the middle of a battlefield, then you accept the risk of getting shot.

      The Shadowed Knight

      Reply
  9. SFC Ton Post author

    I know a dude or two who are paid to fuck up dudes through their cellphone.

    Like they down load child p*rn on to your phone with a search history etc. From that point its tipping off the cops or do as we say

    or they track you through the cellphone and turn on our mike. catch you while your fucking and shitting and cant defend yourself
    world without end amen

    Reply
    1. BuenaVista

      Basically, our addictions to screens and new cars means we are increasingly all wandering around with GPS ankle bracelets, with one way microphones that work even when the devices are powered down.

      Reply
      1. SFC Ton Post author

        yup

        volume of information they have to go through works in our favor and they are pretty lazy so cutting the iphone/ govt gps ankle bracelet for a few hours gives you space to operate

  10. SFC Ton Post author

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/7106420/Europe-to-very-soon-have-more-Muslims-than-Christians-Belgian-minister-warns-against-making-an-enemy-of-Islam-at-Brussels-attacks-hearing.html

    the clock in Western Europe is running down fast. With in a generation one set of bodies will be hitting the floor. Hajjis or White folks. I will always choose the well being of Whites over non Whites or the Tim Wise sort of Whites (he’s a jew so not White but claims to be White to work his genocidal plans )

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/11/tim-wise-hates-white-people/

    sooooo

    Reply
    1. theshadowedknight

      Ton, while your song is nice–sweet, even–you should look into some harder music.

      Manowar’s “Hail and Kill”

      Favorite line: “Rape their women as they cry! HAHAHAHAHA!” It makes me laugh every time I think about it.

      Manowar’s “Blood of the Kings”

      The Shadowed Knight

      Reply
  11. redpillgirlnotes

    I know I am kinda trying to make light there but truly, women are not psychologically able to process these kinds of discussions, one reason of many why I don’t believe they should be in combat. It’s too scary. It’s man stuff.

    Btw thank God for men like you guys!!! And I am not kidding when I say I admire and respect you all very much. I am glad you guys are not on the other side, that’s for darn sure! You are scary fuckers (in a good way)! Yikes!

    God forbid that any of this ever happens, I’ll hide in the hills and stay out of the way. I’ll make some food and grog and have it waiting!

    La la la la…

    Reply
    1. SFC Ton Post author

      Bloom, while I have not banned women this is not the place to be chatty Kathy either

      You and the ladies at your blog burned some bridges, I have near on 0 interest in rebuilding them

      Reply
      1. redpillgirlnotes

        To be honest I didn’t know what to do about that. I stopped reading it myself and almost deleted the whole blog, actually. I get the frustration and I am sorry how all that went down. Truly.

      2. SFC Ton Post author

        men aren’t big on “I’m sorry” with no follow on actions and you seem to be having problems with the not being a chatty Kathy concept

        you have your own blog to address whatever you think best but my blog is not the place to discus it

  12. Artisanal Toad

    I suppose it all comes down to the code you choose to live by, but most men don’t have a code.

    I had two friends I served with who are now dead by suicide (more, actually, but I was only friends with two of them). Both had skills, were reasonably well trained, intelligent and could have put together a plan to inflict some serious pain on the system before being taken out. They chose suicide instead and I’ve often wondered why so many men choose that route, but I finally think I have the answer.

    Whether you choose to look at the issue of how men are being destroyed by feminism, or the issue of abortion (to name just two of them), it comes down to a system that was put in place by a political process. That means while the legislators, judges, lawyers, doctors, nurses and cops aren’t innocent of their role of being cogs in the machine, ultimately the people who bear responsibility for the systematic wrongdoing are the PEOPLE of the state who allow it. It makes no sense to target the cadre who are implementing the program IF those ultimately responsible are not the primary recipients of accountability for what they have allowed to happen.

    Therefore, the only moral response is to primarily target the people responsible, which is the average Joe and Jane voter; then the cadre. Something along the lines of a Sarajevo “fry the brain” strategy. That happens to be the most effective strategy available- look at what Mohammed and Boyd accomplished in DC (and they made *lots* of mistakes). Today, with wireless remote-controlled stuff available off the shelf, anybody with a grand to drop on the project can put together a remote-controlled shooting platform, which separates the shooter from the weapon (and allows placing said weapon in a place investigators wouldn’t think to look because their major assumption is a human was present to pull the trigger).

    The big question is the morality of targeting the body politic with lethal force because of what they are allowing.

    I’m old school in the morality department and when I have questions about what is moral and what isn’t, I look to the Bible. Numbers 25 is a perfect example in this case. The Moabites sent their young women into the camp to lure the men into idolatry (Baalam’s strategy- the “sin of Baalam”) and in response God told Moses to take the leaders of the people and crucify them before the assembly the next morning. Got that? God wanted the leaders held responsible for the sins of the people.

    But… Moses didn’t do it. Instead, he went to the leaders he was commanded to execute and told them to punish (kill) the men who had been lured away into idolatry.

    What did God do? The leaders (Moses was at the top) wouldn’t put their own house in order so God punished everyone. He sent a plague into the camp and killed 24,000 people while Moses was weeping in front of the tabernacle. God is not a respecter of persons and this is what comes of an appeasement strategy.

    The people were dropping like flies until Phineas manned up and killed Zimri (one of the guys Moses was supposed to have executed) and his Middianite wench, Cozbi after they publicly strolled though the camp on their way to his tent. According to legend, Phineas got them while Zimri was banging Cozbi and ran them both through with his spear, killing both with one thrust. For that, God gave Phineas His covenant of peace and created an everlasting priesthood in his name.

    Points to keep in mind are that Phineas was the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the High Priest- a grandnephew of Moses. When Moses abdicated his responsibility to hold the leaders accountable, God punished the people. However, when another man who was of the leadership class (Phineas) stepped up and executed righteous judgment, God stopped the plague and honored Phineas with a covenant of peace and a priesthood in his name.

    Way back when, pastors like John Bunyan (the Pilgrim’s Progress guy) were preaching with the Geneva Bible, which had extensive notes included by guys like Calvin, Luther and Zwingli. This passage was so politically hot (along with the one about when Jesus was asked if He and his disciples paid the poll tax) that the homosexual Catholic James decided to do something about it. That’s where the King James Bible came from, which was just the text with no notes of explanation from guys who had spent a lifetime of Bible study. And, they fudged the translation a bit for political reasons. That’s how we got “Thou shall do no murder” translated as “Thou shall not kill.” Look at Numbers 25 in the original King James version and you’ll see how they tried to keep people from understanding what the passage said about holding the leaders responsible when the people don’t obey God:

    King James Bible (original)
    “And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of the LORD may be turned away from Israel.”

    New American Standard Bible (best modern translation)
    “The LORD said to Moses, “Take all the leaders of the people and execute them in broad daylight before the LORD, so that the fierce anger of the LORD may turn away from Israel.”

    Today, we have leaders who refuse to clean house and they allow the murder and injustice to continue (hell- they cheer it on). But Christians (if they can even discuss this) will say we have to wait for God to rain down fire on everyone and destroy the place because the idea of a man like Phineas is too much for them to bear. Now… what are the odds that the line of Phineas didn’t die out? That’s an important question because of verses 10-13

    “Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned away My wrath from the sons of Israel in that he was jealous with My jealousy among them, so that I did not destroy the sons of Israel in My jealousy. Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give him My covenant of peace; and it shall be for him and his descendants [seed] after him, a covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he was jealous for his God and made atonement for the sons of Israel.’”

    I suspect we still have the sons of Phineas with us because when God calls something perpetual, it’s gonna last. Thus endeth the Bible study.

    Reply
    1. SFC Ton Post author

      They chose suicide instead and I’ve often wondered why so many men choose that route
      —–

      because they are pussies. Samson killed himself and his enemies. Thats how a man does it

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s